Skip to main content
Skip to main content
Polkadot logo

Results of DOT Redenomination Referendum

A referendum was just held on Kusama regarding whether or not to redenominate DOTs on Polkadot in a 1:100 ratio. Web3 Foundation used this referendum to gauge sentiment from the community before the launch of Polkadot.

By PolkadotMay 15, 2020

A referendum was just held on Kusama regarding whether or not to redenominate DOTs on Polkadot in a 1:100 ratio. Web3 Foundation used this referendum to gauge sentiment from the community before the launch of Polkadot.

The referendum, detailed on Polkassembly, would change the number of Plancks that constitute a single DOT. Plancks are the smallest unit of account in Polkadot, much like Satoshis in Bitcoin. Specifically, the referendum proposed changing a single DOT from one trillion Plancks per DOT to ten billion Plancks per DOT, a 100x decrease that would be offset by a 100x increase in the number of DOTs.

As such, the total number of Plancks in the system, and each DOT holder’s share of the network, would remain unchanged.

Among the benefits of this change would be the ability to deal with more ergonomic or human-readable units, like whole numbers rather than small decimals. Conversely, redenominating DOTs may cause confusion among DOT holders, which may prove fertile ground for scammers to take advantage. Some wallets and documentation may require updates, and it would also mean that DOTs would have a different precision than KSM (10 vs. 12, respectively).

Although the referendum was held on Kusama, it has no real effect on the Kusama network itself. The referendum will automatically enact seven days after the vote ended, and place a specific remark on the Kusama chain.

With turnout of more than 13%, this has been the most voted-on referendum in Kusama history, generating spirited discussions on Polkassembly, Riot, Twitter and elsewhere. Judging by this commentary and the voting activity, it appears that the Kusama community is broadly split and feels quite strongly about the referendum.

Though the referendum is not binding in any way, it allowed the Kusama stakeholders (who we see as largely, but not entirely, aligned with Polkadot stakeholders) to express their thoughts on the matter. Neither the Web3 Foundation nor Parity Technologies used its KSM to vote. With an impressively large turnout, a significant majority was recorded in favour of redenomination.

Informally, had the referendum recorded very little dissent, it is likely that Web3 Foundation, in its central role over the initial network launch, would have stood behind the redenomination proposal. However, given the non-negligible amount of opposition, including from some within the ranks of Web3 Foundation and Parity, the Foundation decided that we cannot, in good faith, sponsor redenomination at present.

From here, we see only two options: do nothing and allow the current denomination to stand, or conduct a final, binding vote on the Polkadot network itself. As proponents of self-determination and on-chain governance, the latter is our favoured option.

However, conducting a vote on denomination during the launch process, and specifically after genesis, would be quite a technical feat with great potential to cause confusion all round. As such, it is not something we will condone without a reasonable belief that it will not cause major problems. We will be researching the technicalities of the matter, canvassing key community stakeholders and infrastructure providers, and monitoring the usual social media channels on the matter to determine if such a vote could be safely executed.

Web3 Foundation and the Polkadot community have learned several lessons from the referendum. The Democracy pallet that Kusama uses has several issues when being used purely to signal intention. It was designed to make decisions that directly impact the chain in question, and some features that enhance this capability (such as time-locked conviction voting) are suboptimal from the point of view of determining sentiment regarding another chain.

Turnout was extremely high for an on-chain vote, showing that users of the network care about this topic and that stakeholders will vote on essential governance topics.

Learn More

Learn More about Kusama's Governance on the Wiki.

Join the discussion on Telegram and Riot, or subscribe to the newsletter. Learn more about Polkadot in the Polkadot Lightpaper and the Polkadot Wiki.

From the blog

Security isn’t optional: What builders are factoring into chain choice

Security is no longer an afterthought in blockchain development. Builders are looking beyond incentives to long-term infrastructure stability. Here's why resiliency is critical and how the Polkadot Assurance Legion is helping developers launch safely.

How to set up a Polkadot wallet: A step-by-step guide

New to Polkadot? This beginner-friendly guide walks you through how to set up a Polkadot-compatible wallet, from choosing the right option to securing your seed phrase and getting started with staking and managing your DOT.

What is a DAO? How decentralized communities are reshaping governance

DAOs are changing how communities organize online. Learn what a DAO is, how decentralized governance works, the different types of DAOs, and how you can participate in blockchain-powered decision-making.

Governance, side by side: Polkadot, Ethereum, and NEAR

Decentralized Mic pulled together experts from leading experts from Polkadot, Ethereum, and NEAR to discuss decentralized decision-making approaches, address participation challenges, and explore the potential impact of AI on future governance models.

Where real-world value meets access: How Polkadot powers RWA and DePIN

Polkadot is making real-world assets and infrastructure accessible through tokenization, unlocking new opportunities in finance and energy for everyday participants and communities.

Understanding DeFi: A starter guide to decentralized finance

DeFi transforms traditional finance by replacing banks and brokers with smart contracts on blockchain networks. Discover how dapps enable lending, trading, and earning interest without intermediaries—and how Polkadot’s interoperability brings these tools together for a connected financial future.

The evolution of digital ownership: How tokenization is transforming gaming, music, and beyond

Tokenization is redefining digital ownership in gaming and music, enabling players and artists to control their assets. With blockchain, NFTs, and Polkadot’s interoperability, digital economies are becoming more decentralized, secure, and accessible.

Web3 funding playbook for builders, creators, and founders

Discover funding opportunities in the Polkadot ecosystem, from grants and bounties to venture capital and community-driven fundraising. Explore pathways for builders at every stage, with insights on securing support for DeFi, DePIN, AI, gaming, and real-world asset tokenization.

From speculation to sustainability: Top ETHDenver takeaways

ETHDenver 2025 highlighted Web3’s shift toward sustainability, emphasizing talent development, decentralized governance, and aligned incentives. Polkadot’s insights reinforced the industry’s move beyond speculation toward long-term, community-driven growth.

Build, Play, Connect: Join Polkadot at ETHDenver 2025

Get ready for ETHDenver 2025 with Polkadot! Join Polkadot for keynotes, hacker houses & parties, immersive booth experiences, and hands-on workshops. Whether you’re building, playing, or connecting, there’s something for everyone at one of blockchain’s biggest events.

The most impactful blockchain use cases in 2025 and why Polkadot is leading the way

Explore the top blockchain trends of 2025, from decentralized AI and tokenized assets to enterprise adoption and Web3 gaming. Learn how projects powered by Polkadot are shaping the future of finance, infrastructure, and digital identity.

Decentralization’s ripple effect: How Web3 is rewriting digital sovereignty

Centralized platforms dictate access, control data, and pose security risks, leaving individuals without control over their digital presence. Decentralization offers a resilient alternative, paving the way to a digitally sovereign future.